Search This Blog

MDM - Selection of Data

Data and Analyzed

The process of using the data as part of the MDM. The data element itself may not be subject to analysis (eg, glucose), but it is instead included in the thought processes for diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment. Tests ordered are presumed to be analyzed when the results are reported. Therefore, when they are ordered during an encounter, they are counted in that encounter. 

Tests that are ordered outside of an encounter may be counted in the encounter in which they are analyzed. 

In the case of a recurring ordereach new result may be counted in the encounter in which it is analyzed. 

For example, an encounter that includes an order for monthly prothrombin times would count for one prothrombin time ordered and reviewed. 

Additional future results, if analyzed in a subsequent encounter, may be counted as a single test in that subsequent encounter. 

Any service for which the professional component is separately reported by the physician or other qualified health care professional reporting the E/M services is not counted as a data element ordered, reviewed, analyzed, or independently interpreted for the purposes of determining the level of MDM.

Test

Tests are imaging, laboratory, psychometric, or physiologic data. A clinical laboratory panel (eg, basic metabolic panel [80047]) is a single test. 

The differentiation between single or multiple unique tests is defined in accordance with the CPT code set. For the purposes of data reviewed and analyzed, pulse oximetry is not a test

Unique Source

A unique test is defined by the CPT code set. When multiple results of the same unique test (eg, serial blood glucose values) are compared during an E/M service, count it as one unique test.

Tests that have overlapping elements are not unique, even if they are identified with distinct CPT codes.

For example, a CBC with differential would incorporate the set of hemoglobin, CBC without differential, and platelet count. A unique source is defined as a physician or qualified heath care professional in a distinct group or different specialty or subspecialty, or a unique entity. Review of all materials from any unique source counts as one element toward MDM.

Combination of Data Elements

A combination of different data elements, for example, a combination of notes reviewed, tests ordered, tests reviewed, or independent historian, allows these elements to be summed. 

It does not require each item type or category to be represented. A unique test ordered, plus a note reviewed and an independent historian would be a combination of three elements.

External

External records, communications and/or test results are from an external physician, other qualified health care professional, facility, or health care organization. 

External physician or other qualified health care professional

An external physician or other qualified health care professional who is not in the same group practice or is of a different specialty or sub-specialty. 

This includes licensed professionals who are practicing independently. The individual may also be a facility or organizational provider such as from a hospital, nursing facility, or home health care agency.

Discussion

Discussion requires an interactive exchange. The exchange must be direct and not through intermediaries (eg, clinical staff or trainees). Sending chart notes or written exchanges that are within progress notes does not qualify as an interactive exchange. 

The discussion does not need to be on the date of the encounter, but it is counted only once and only when it is used in the decision making of the encounter. It may be asynchronous (ie, does not need to be in person), but it must be initiated and completed within a short time period (eg, within a day or two).

Independent historian(s)

An individual (eg, parent, guardian, surrogate, spouse, witness) who provides a history in addition to a history provided by the patient who is unable to provide a complete or reliable history (eg, due to developmental stage, dementia, or psychosis) or because a confirmatory history is judged to be necessary. 

In the case where there may be conflict or poor communication between multiple historians and more than one historian is needed, the independent historian requirement is met. 

The independent history does not need to be obtained in person but does need to be obtained directly from the historian providing the independent information.

Independent interpretation

The interpretation of a test for which there is a CPT code and an interpretation or report is customary. This does not apply when the physician or other qualified health care professional is reporting the service or has previously reported the service for the patient. 

A form of interpretation should be documented but need not conform to the usual standards of a complete report for the test.

Appropriate source

For the purpose of the discussion of management data element Levels of Medical Decision Making), an appropriate source includes professionals who are not health care professionals but may be involved in the management of the patient (eg, lawyer, parole officer, case manager, teacher). It does not include discussion with family or informal caregivers.

MDM - Selection of Diagnosis

Number and Complexity of Problems Addressed at the Encounter  

One element used in selecting the level of office or other outpatient services is the number and complexity of the problems that are addressed at an encounter. 

Multiple new or established conditions may be addressed at the same time and may affect MDM. Symptoms may cluster around a specific diagnosis and each symptom is not necessarily a unique condition. 

The Comorbidities/underlying diseases, in and of themselves, are not considered in selecting a level of E/M services unless they are addressed, and their presence increases the amount and/or complexity of data to be reviewed and analyzed or the risk of complications and/or morbidity or mortality of patient management. 

The final diagnosis for a condition does not, in and of itself, determine the complexity or risk, as extensive evaluation may be required to reach the conclusion that the signs or symptoms do not represent a highly morbid condition. 

Therefore, presenting symptoms that are likely to represent a highly morbid condition may “drive” MDM even when the ultimate diagnosis is not highly morbid. The evaluation and/or treatment should be consistent with the likely nature of the condition. Multiple problems of a lower severity may, in the aggregate, create higher risk due to interaction.

Definitions for the elements of MDM

Problem

A problem is a disease, condition, illness, injury, symptom, sign, finding, complaint, or other matter addressed at the encounter, with or without a diagnosis being established at the time of the encounter

Problem addressed

A problem is addressed or managed when it is evaluated or treated at the encounter by the physician or other qualified health care professional reporting the service. 

This includes consideration of further testing or treatment that may not be elected by virtue of risk/benefit analysis or patient/parent/guardian/ surrogate choice. 

Notation in the patient’s medical record that another professional is managing the problem without additional assessment or care coordination documented does not qualify as being addressed or managed by the physician or other qualified health care professional reporting the service. 

Referral without evaluation (by history, examination, or diagnostic study[ies]) or consideration of treatment does not qualify as being addressed or managed by the physician or other qualified health care professional reporting the service.

Minimal problem

A problem that may not require the presence of the physician or other qualified health care professional, but the service is provided under the physician’s or other qualified health care professional’s supervision (see 99211). 

Self-limited or minor problem

A problem that runs a definite and prescribed course, is transient in nature, and is not likely to permanently alter health status.

Stable, chronic illness

A problem with an expected duration of at least one year or until the death of the patient. For the purpose of defining chronicity, conditions are treated as chronic whether or not stage or severity changes (eg, uncontrolled diabetes and controlled diabetes are a single chronic condition). 

“Stable” for the purposes of categorizing MDM is defined by the specific treatment goals for an individual patient. A patient who is not at his or her treatment goal is not stable, even if the condition has not changed and there is no short-term threat to life or function. 

For example, in a patient with persistently poorly controlled blood pressure for whom better control is a goal is not stable, even if the pressures are not changing and the patient is asymptomatic, The risk of morbidity without treatment is significant. Examples may include well-controlled hypertension, noninsulin- dependent diabetes, cataract, or benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Acute, uncomplicated illness or injury

A recent or new short-term problem with low risk of morbidity for which treatment is considered. There is little to no risk of mortality with treatment, and full recovery without functional impairment is expected. 

A problem that is normally self-limited or minor but is not resolving consistent with a definite and prescribed course is an acute, uncomplicated illness. 

Examples may include cystitis, allergic rhinitis, or a simple sprain. 

Chronic illness with exacerbation, progression, or side effects of treatment

A chronic illness that is acutely worsening, poorly controlled, or progressing with an intent to control progression and requiring additional supportive care or requiring attention to treatment for side effects but that does not require consideration of hospital level of care. 

Undiagnosed new problem with uncertain prognosis

A problem in the differential diagnosis that represents a condition likely to result in a high risk of morbidity without treatment. An example may be a lump in the breast.

Acute illness with systemic symptoms

An illness that causes systemic symptoms and has a high risk of morbidity without treatment. 

For systemic general symptoms, such as fever, body aches, or fatigue in a minor illness that may be treated to alleviate symptoms, shorten the course of illness, or to prevent complications, see the definitions for self-limited or minor problem or acute, uncomplicated illness or injury. 

Systemic symptoms may not be general but may be single system. Examples may include pyelonephritis, pneumonitis, or colitis.

Acute, complicated injury

An injury which requires treatment that includes evaluation of body systems that are not directly part of the injured organ, the injury is extensive, or the treatment options are multiple and/or associated with risk of morbidity. An example may be a head injury with brief loss of consciousness. 

Chronic illness with severe exacerbation, progression, or side effects of treatment

The severe exacerbation or progression of a chronic illness or severe side effects of treatment that have significant risk of morbidity and may require hospital level of care. 

Acute or chronic illness or injury that poses a threat to life or bodily function

An acute illness with systemic symptoms, an acute complicated injury, or a chronic illness or injury with exacerbation and/or progression or side effects of treatment, that poses a threat to life or bodily function in the near term without treatment. 

Examples may include acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus, severe respiratory distress, progressive severe rheumatoid arthritis, psychiatric illness with potential threat to self or others, peritonitis, acute renal failure, or an abrupt change in neurological status.

Details and Definition of MDM 2021

Number and Complexity of Problems Addressed at the Encounter  

One element used in selecting the level of office or other outpatient services is the number and complexity of the problems that are addressed at an encounter. 

Multiple new or established conditions may be addressed at the same time and may affect MDM. Symptoms may cluster around a specific diagnosis and each symptom is not necessarily a unique condition. 

The Comorbidities/underlying diseases, in and of themselves, are not considered in selecting a level of E/M services unless they are addressed, and their presence increases the amount and/or complexity of data to be reviewed and analyzed or the risk of complications and/or morbidity or mortality of patient management. 

The final diagnosis for a condition does not, in and of itself, determine the complexity or risk, as extensive evaluation may be required to reach the conclusion that the signs or symptoms do not represent a highly morbid condition. 

Therefore, presenting symptoms that are likely to represent a highly morbid condition may “drive” MDM even when the ultimate diagnosis is not highly morbid. The evaluation and/or treatment should be consistent with the likely nature of the condition. Multiple problems of a lower severity may, in the aggregate, create higher risk due to interaction.

Definitions for the elements of MDM

Problem

A problem is a disease, condition, illness, injury, symptom, sign, finding, complaint, or other matter addressed at the encounter, with or without a diagnosis being established at the time of the encounter

Problem addressed

A problem is addressed or managed when it is evaluated or treated at the encounter by the physician or other qualified health care professional reporting the service. 

This includes consideration of further testing or treatment that may not be elected by virtue of risk/benefit analysis or patient/parent/guardian/ surrogate choice. 

Notation in the patient’s medical record that another professional is managing the problem without additional assessment or care coordination documented does not qualify as being addressed or managed by the physician or other qualified health care professional reporting the service. 

Referral without evaluation (by history, examination, or diagnostic study[ies]) or consideration of treatment does not qualify as being addressed or managed by the physician or other qualified health care professional reporting the service.

Minimal problem

A problem that may not require the presence of the physician or other qualified health care professional, but the service is provided under the physician’s or other qualified health care professional’s supervision (see 99211). 

Self-limited or minor problem

A problem that runs a definite and prescribed course, is transient in nature, and is not likely to permanently alter health status.

Stable, chronic illness

A problem with an expected duration of at least one year or until the death of the patient. For the purpose of defining chronicity, conditions are treated as chronic whether or not stage or severity changes (eg, uncontrolled diabetes and controlled diabetes are a single chronic condition). 

“Stable” for the purposes of categorizing MDM is defined by the specific treatment goals for an individual patient. A patient who is not at his or her treatment goal is not stable, even if the condition has not changed and there is no short-term threat to life or function. 

For example, in a patient with persistently poorly controlled blood pressure for whom better control is a goal is not stable, even if the pressures are not changing and the patient is asymptomatic, The risk of morbidity without treatment is significant. Examples may include well-controlled hypertension, noninsulin- dependent diabetes, cataract, or benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Acute, uncomplicated illness or injury

A recent or new short-term problem with low risk of morbidity for which treatment is considered. There is little to no risk of mortality with treatment, and full recovery without functional impairment is expected. 

A problem that is normally self-limited or minor but is not resolving consistent with a definite and prescribed course is an acute, uncomplicated illness. 

Examples may include cystitis, allergic rhinitis, or a simple sprain. 

Chronic illness with exacerbation, progression, or side effects of treatment

A chronic illness that is acutely worsening, poorly controlled, or progressing with an intent to control progression and requiring additional supportive care or requiring attention to treatment for side effects but that does not require consideration of hospital level of care. 

Undiagnosed new problem with uncertain prognosis

A problem in the differential diagnosis that represents a condition likely to result in a high risk of morbidity without treatment. An example may be a lump in the breast.

Acute illness with systemic symptoms

An illness that causes systemic symptoms and has a high risk of morbidity without treatment. 

For systemic general symptoms, such as fever, body aches, or fatigue in a minor illness that may be treated to alleviate symptoms, shorten the course of illness, or to prevent complications, see the definitions for self-limited or minor problem or acute, uncomplicated illness or injury. 

Systemic symptoms may not be general but may be single system. Examples may include pyelonephritis, pneumonitis, or colitis.

Acute, complicated injury

An injury which requires treatment that includes evaluation of body systems that are not directly part of the injured organ, the injury is extensive, or the treatment options are multiple and/or associated with risk of morbidity. An example may be a head injury with brief loss of consciousness. 

Chronic illness with severe exacerbation, progression, or side effects of treatment

The severe exacerbation or progression of a chronic illness or severe side effects of treatment that have significant risk of morbidity and may require hospital level of care. 

Acute or chronic illness or injury that poses a threat to life or bodily function

An acute illness with systemic symptoms, an acute complicated injury, or a chronic illness or injury with exacerbation and/or progression or side effects of treatment, that poses a threat to life or bodily function in the near term without treatment. 

Examples may include acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus, severe respiratory distress, progressive severe rheumatoid arthritis, psychiatric illness with potential threat to self or others, peritonitis, acute renal failure, or an abrupt change in neurologic status.

Data and Analyzed

The process of using the data as part of the MDM. The data element itself may not be subject to analysis (eg, glucose), but it is instead included in the thought processes for diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment. Tests ordered are presumed to be analyzed when the results are reported. Therefore, when they are ordered during an encounter, they are counted in that encounter. 

Tests that are ordered outside of an encounter may be counted in the encounter in which they are analyzed. 

In the case of a recurring order, each new result may be counted in the encounter in which it is analyzed. 

For example, an encounter that includes an order for monthly prothrombin times would count for one prothrombin time ordered and reviewed. 

Additional future results, if analyzed in a subsequent encounter, may be counted as a single test in that subsequent encounter. 

Any service for which the professional component is separately reported by the physician or other qualified health care professional reporting the E/M services is not counted as a data element ordered, reviewed, analyzed, or independently interpreted for the purposes of determining the level of MDM.

Test

Tests are imaging, laboratory, psychometric, or physiologic data. A clinical laboratory panel (eg, basic metabolic panel [80047]) is a single test. 

The differentiation between single or multiple unique tests is defined in accordance with the CPT code set. For the purposes of data reviewed and analyzed, pulse oximetry is not a test

Unique Source

A unique test is defined by the CPT code set. When multiple results of the same unique test (eg, serial blood glucose values) are compared during an E/M service, count it as one unique test.

Tests that have overlapping elements are not unique, even if they are identified with distinct CPT codes.

For example, a CBC with differential would incorporate the set of hemoglobin, CBC without differential, and platelet count. A unique source is defined as a physician or qualified heath care professional in a distinct group or different specialty or subspecialty, or a unique entity. Review of all materials from any unique source counts as one element toward MDM.

Combination of Data Elements

A combination of different data elements, for example, a combination of notes reviewed, tests ordered, tests reviewed, or independent historian, allows these elements to be summed. 

It does not require each item type or category to be represented. A unique test ordered, plus a note reviewed and an independent historian would be a combination of three elements.

External

External records, communications and/or test results are from an external physician, other qualified health care professional, facility, or health care organization. 

External physician or other qualified health care professional

An external physician or other qualified health care professional who is not in the same group practice or is of a different specialty or subspecialty. 

This includes licensed professionals who are practicing independently. The individual may also be a facility or organizational provider such as from a hospital, nursing facility, or home health care agency.

Discussion

Discussion requires an interactive exchange. The exchange must be direct and not through intermediaries (eg, clinical staff or trainees). Sending chart notes or written exchanges that are within progress notes does not qualify as an interactive exchange. 

The discussion does not need to be on the date of the encounter, but it is counted only once and only when it is used in the decision making of the encounter. It may be asynchronous (ie, does not need to be in person), but it must be initiated and completed within a short time period (eg, within a day or two).

Independent historian(s)

An individual (eg, parent, guardian, surrogate, spouse, witness) who provides a history in addition to a history provided by the patient who is unable to provide a complete or reliable history (eg, due to developmental stage, dementia, or psychosis) or because a confirmatory history is judged to be necessary. 

In the case where there may be conflict or poor communication between multiple historians and more than one historian is needed, the independent historian requirement is met. 

The independent history does not need to be obtained in person but does need to be obtained directly from the historian providing the independent information.

Independent interpretation

The interpretation of a test for which there is a CPT code and an interpretation or report is customary. This does not apply when the physician or other qualified health care professional is reporting the service or has previously reported the service for the patient. 

A form of interpretation should be documented but need not conform to the usual standards of a complete report for the test.

Appropriate source

For the purpose of the discussion of management data element Levels of Medical Decision Making), an appropriate source includes professionals who are not health care professionals but may be involved in the management of the patient (eg, lawyer, parole officer, case manager, teacher). It does not include discussion with family or informal caregivers.

Risk

The probability and/or consequences of an event. The assessment of the level of risk is affected by the nature of the event under consideration.

For example, a low probability of death may be high risk, whereas a high chance of a minor, self-limited adverse effect of treatment may be low risk. 

Definitions of risk are based upon the usual behavior and thought processes of a physician or other qualified health care professional in the same specialty. 

Trained clinicians apply common language usage meanings to terms such as high, medium, low, or minimal risk and do not require quantification for these definitions (though quantification may be provided when evidence-based medicine has established probabilities). 

For the purposes of MDM, level of risk is based upon consequences of the problem(s) addressed at the encounter when appropriately treated. Risk also includes MDM related to the need to initiate or forego further testing, treatment, and/or hospitalization. 

The risk of patient management criteria applies to the patient management decisions made by the reporting physician or other qualified health care professional as part of the reported encounter.

Morbidity

A state of illness or functional impairment that is expected to be of substantial duration during which function is limited, quality of life is impaired, or there is organ damage that may not be transient despite treatment. 

Social determinants of health 

Economic and social conditions that influence the health of people and communities. Examples may include food or housing insecurity.

Surgery (minor or major, elective, emergency, procedure or patient risk):  

Surgery–Minor or Major

The classification of surgery into minor or major is based on the common meaning of such terms when used by trained clinicians, similar to the use of the term “risk.” These terms are not defined by a surgical package classification. 

Surgery–Elective or Emergency

Elective procedures and emergent or urgent procedures describe the timing of a procedure when the timing is related to the patient’s condition. 

An elective procedure is typically planned in advance (eg, scheduled for weeks later), while an emergent procedure is typically performed immediately or with minimal delay to allow for patient stabilization.

Both elective and emergent procedures may be minor or major procedures.

Surgery–Risk Factors, Patient or Procedure

Risk factors are those that are relevant to the patient and procedure. Evidence-based risk calculators may be used, but are not required, in assessing patient and procedure risk.

Drug therapy requiring intensive monitoring for toxicity

A drug that requires intensive monitoring is a therapeutic agent that has the potential to cause serious morbidity or death. 

The monitoring is performed for assessment of these adverse effects and not primarily for assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

The monitoring should be that which is generally accepted practice for the agent but may be patient-specific in some cases. 

Intensive monitoring may be long-term or short-term. Long-term intensive monitoring is not performed less than quarterly. 

The monitoring may be performed with a laboratory test, a physiologic test, or imaging. Monitoring by history or examination does not qualify. 

The monitoring affects the level of MDM in an encounter in which it is considered in the management of the patient. 

Examples may include monitoring for cytopenia in the use of an antineoplastic agent between dose cycles or the short-term intensive monitoring of electrolytes and renal function in a patient who is undergoing diuresis. 

Examples of monitoring that do not qualify include monitoring glucose levels during insulin therapy, as the primary reason is the therapeutic effect (even if unless severe hypoglycemia is a current, significant concern); or annual electrolytes and renal function for a patient on a diuretic, as the frequency does not meet the threshold. 

Return to E/M Guidelines for Office/Outpatient 2021


E/M Guidelines for Office/Outpatient 2021

E/M Guidelines for Office/Outpatient History and Exam

The 2021 E&M Guidelines for Office or Other Outpatient E/M Services will help you understand the revised E/M codes.

The History and/or Examination portion of these E/M guidelines explains that office and other outpatient E/M services include “a medically appropriate history and/or physical examination, when performed.”

The “Medically appropriate” means that the physician or other qualified healthcare professional reporting the E/M determines the nature and extent of any history or exam for a particular service.

Remember that code selection does not depend on the level of history or exam.

The history and exam guidelines for office and outpatient E/M visits also specify that the “care team” may collect information, and the patient (or caregiver) may provide information, such as by portal or questionnaire. The reporting provider must then review that information.

MEDICAL DECISION ON MAKING GUIDELINES

The code selection will be either total encounter time or MDM to select the level of office or other outpatient E/M in 2021, 

In the 2021 MDM guidelines, CPT states that MDM “includes establishing diagnoses, assessing the status of a condition, and/or selecting a management option.” Three elements define MDM for office/outpatient visits in 2021, and they are similar but not identical to the 2020 elements

 

Table Row 1 Diagnosis

 

The number and complexity of the problem or problems the provider addresses during the E/M encounter.
  • In 2020, the guidelines instead referred to “the number of possible diagnoses and/or the number of management options.”

Table Row 2 Data

 

The amount and/or complexity of data to be reviewed and analyzed.” The 2021 guidelines list three categories for data: 
  1. Tests, documents, orders, or independent historians, 
  2. Independent test interpretation, and 
  3. Discussion of management or test interpretation with external providers or appropriate sources. 
The latter term refers to non-healthcare, non-family sources involved in patient management, like a parole officer or case manager.
  • The 2020 MDM guidelines also included the amount and/or complexity of medical records, test, and other information involved, but the 2021 guidelines expand the section significantly

 

Table Row 3 Risk

 

The risk of complications and/or morbidity or mortality of patient management decisions made at the visit.” 

The 2021 guidelines make it clear that options considered, but not selected, are still a factor for this element, specifically after “shared” MDM with the patient, family, or both. Examples include deciding against hospitalization for a psychiatric patient with sufficient support for outpatient care or choosing palliative care for a patient with advanced dementia and an acute condition.
  • The 2020 MDM guidelines included comparable wording, but they did not include the reference to shared MDM or the examples found in the 2021 guidelines.

MDM - Medical Decision Making Table

The 2021 MDM table in the CPT E/M guidelines has three main columns with the final column divided into three additional columns
  1. Code
  2. Level of MDM (Based on 2 out of 3 Elements of MDM)
  3. Elements of Medical Decision Making
    • Number and Complexity of Problems Addressed at the Encounter
    • Amount and/or Complexity of Data to be Reviewed and Analyzed
    • Risk of Complications and/or Morbidity or Mortality of Patient Management


Additional Information About Modifiers

Sequencing of modifiers 

How can that be if the modifiers used were accurate? 

There is an order to reporting modifiers and there are three categories that modifier usage fall under: 

1. Pricing 

  • Pricing modifiers are always sequenced “before” payment modifiers and/or location modifiers.  
  • The only exception to this rule is when a global surgery package is involved. 
  • For example, you would code modifier 58 first and modifier 82 second in a global surgery. 
  • A few examples of pricing modifiers are: 22, 26, 50, 52, 53, 62, 80, and P1-P6.  

2. Payment  

  • Payment modifiers alert the insurance carrier that there is a special situation within the claim 
  • Some examples of payment modifiers would be: 24, 25, 51, 57, 58, 59, 76, and 78. 

3. Location 

  • Examples of location modifiers are: E1-E4, FA, F1-F9, LC, LD, LT, RT, RC, TA, and T1-T9. 
The general order of sequencing modifiers is (1) pricing (2) payment (3) location. Location modifiers, in all coding situations, are coded “last”. 

If you code two pricing modifiers that include either a professional or technical component (26 or TC), always use the 26 or TC first, followed by the second pricing modifier. 

If you have two payment modifiers, for example 51 and 59, enter 59 first and 51 second. If 51 and 78 are the required modifiers, you would enter 78 in the first position. 

Additional Information 

000 = Endoscopic or minor procedure with related preoperative and postoperative relative value units on the day of the procedure only, included in the fee schedule payment amount 

010 = Minor procedure with preoperative relative values on the day of the procedure and postoperative values during a 10-day postoperative period included in the fee schedule amount 

090 = Major surgery with a one-day preoperative period and 90-day postoperative period included in the fee schedule payment amount 

MMM = Maternity codes. The usual global period does not apply. 

XXX = Global concept does not apply 

YYY = Palmetto GBA will determine whether the global concept applies and establish a postoperative period, if appropriate 

ZZZ = Code is related to another service ("add-on" code) and is always included in the global period of the other service 


Check Modifier  78 & 79

Modifier 78 and 79

Modifier 78 

“Unplanned return to the operating or procedure room by the same physician following initial procedure for a related procedure during the post-operative period 

Modifier 79

“Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician during a post-operative 

Example - Modifier 78 

The Dual chamber Pacemaker (CPT 33208) was implanted on Dec 26th and during the post-operative periods, the patients feel uncomfortable due to pain, hence the provider examined and confirmed the Atrial lead and or Ventricular lead is dislodged, hence provider performed “Repositioning of right atrial or right ventricular lead” on Jan 10th.  

For mentioned above scenarios, the claim must be submitted with modifier 78, since this procedure performed within 90 days. CPT 33215 – 78 

Example - Modifier 79 

The physician may need to indicate that the performance of a procedure or service during the postoperative period was unrelated to the original procedure.  

Provider performs right toe amputation on May 24, 2015 and a left foot amputation On June 25, 2015, surgery was medically necessary within this 90-day global period 

  • 5/24/15 Amputation big toe, RT  28820 TA 
  • 6/25/15 Amputation foot, LT  28800 79 

 

Click here for Additional Information

Usage of Modifier 24 and 59

Modifier 24 

An Unrelated evaluation and management service performed by the same physician or other qualified health care professional during a post-operative period use modifier 24 for E/M Services. (Never to a procedure) 

Modifier 24 is applied to two code sets, 

  • E/M (Evaluation and management) services (99201-99499). 
  • General ophthalmological services (92002-92014), which are eye examination codes. 

Appropriate Use of Modifier 24 

  • An unrelated E/M service is performed beginning the day after the procedure, by the same physician, during the 10 or 90-day post-operative period.  
  • Documentation indicates the service was exclusively for treatment of the underlying condition and not for post-operative care.
  • Unrelated critical care performed by the same physician during the post-operative period. 

Inappropriate Use 

Do not use Modifier 24 when, 

  • The E/M is for a surgical complication or infection. This treatment is part of the surgery package. 
  • The service is removal of sutures or other wound treatment. This treatment is part of the surgery package. 
  • The surgeon admits a patient to a skilled nursing facility for a condition related to the surgery. 
  • The medical record documentation clearly indicates the E/M is related to the surgery. 
  • Outside of the post-op period of a procedure. 
  • Services are rendered on the same day as the procedure 
  • Reporting exams performed for routine postoperative care. 
  • Reporting surgical procedures, labs, x-rays, or supply codes. 

Example 1 

A Cardiologist was implanted Pacemaker Implantation on Dec. 26th due to complete Heart Block, and the patient returns with Chest pain and diagnosed as angina on Jan. 10th.  

The Jan. 10th visit is separately reportable with appropriate level of service codes with modifier 24, since it’s unrelated to the original procedure performed Dec 26th.  

Modifier 59 – X (E, P, S, U) 

“Distinct Procedural Service” - Under certain circumstances, the physician may need to indicate that a procedure or service was distinct or independent from other services performed on the same day. 

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) established four (4) new HCPCS modifiers (XE, XS, XP, and XU) to provide greater reporting specificity in situations where modifier 59 was previously reported. 

XE – “Separate encounter" A service that is distinct because it occurred during a separate encounter” This modifier should only be used to describe separate encounters on the same date of service. 

XS – “Separate Structure" A service that is distinct because it was performed on a separate organ/structure.

XP – “Separate Practitioner" A service that is distinct because it was performed by a different practitioner.

XU – “Unusual Non-Overlapping Service", the use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap usual components of the main service.

  • Modifier 59 should also only be used if there is no other, more appropriate modifier to describe the relationship between two procedure codes.
  • The 59 modifier is one of the most misused modifiers. The most common reason it should be used is to indicate that two or more procedures were performed at the same visit but to different sites on the body. 
  • Modifier 59 should not be appended to an E/M service. 

Examples: 

Modifier XU 

  • If Cardiac Cath (93454 to 93461) & PCI (92920 to 92943) procedure performed together during the same visit. We can bill with modifier XU for Cardiac Cath Procedures (column 2 codes). 

Modifier XE 

  • If the mentioned above procedures are performed in two different encounters, the claim must be billed with modifier XE for Cardiac Cath CPT codes. 

Modifier XP 

  • For mentioned above procedures are performed two different providers’, bill the claim with modifier XP. 

Modifier XS 

  • For same procedure performed in two different location and or anatomical site we can use modifier XS for same CPT code if there are no anatomical site modifiers applicable, (Like RT & LT) 
  • Injection into tendon sheath, right ankle (20550) and injection into tendon sheath, left ankle (20550- XS). 

Note: Medicaid & Medicaid HMO’s would not be accepted Anatomical site modifiers and or HCPCS modifier, so please use modifier 59 instead of X (E, P, S, U) and or not required HCPCS modifier, like RT, LT, RC, LC, LD and etc...) 

Modifier Indicator: 

  • 0: not allowed (ie, modifier -59 is not allowed under any circumstances; the code pair will not be paid separately); 
  • 1: allowed (ie, coders may be able to append modifier -59 to differentiate between services provided; separate payment will be allowed); or 
  • 9: not applicable (ie, no modifier is necessary, as the edit is inactive as of the posted date; services may be separately billable). 

 

ICD 10 CM Updates

Guidelines for billing CPT G2211

About CPT G2211 & Objectives Effective from January 1, 2024, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began reimbursing for ...